Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2484 14
Original file (NR2484 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

   

 
 

°

ns DIC
Docket No, NR2484-14
3 Feb 15.

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of ‘your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

2 February 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. , "

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
MILPERSMAN 1050-272, dated 2 August 2007, states the following about
Post-Mobilization Respite Absence: “Creditable mobilization time is
cumulative, within the rolling 72-month window, and the 1:S5-year ratio
for Reserve members is retroactive for calculation purposes to 7
October 2001. Actual accrual of administrative absence days, however,
is restricted to those members mobilized on or after 19 January 2007."
From January 2002 to December 2005, you accrued 34 months of
creditable time, but earned no administrative absence days. From June
2009 to June 2010, you accrued 4 days of Post-Mobilization Respite
Absence per month for 13 months for a total of 52 days. In accordance
with your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD
Form 214}, you were credited with 52 days, which you took prior to
being released from active duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve.

With regard to your request for modify your orders, in accordance with
NAVADMIN 235/08: (Navy Reserve Component Individual Augmentation (IA)
mobilization business rules), dated 25 august 2008, Al] sailors who
are mobilized in support of GWOT assignments will be issued
involuntary orders pursuant to title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302
authority.” Furthermore, “for members who volunteer to mobilize in
their dwell-time, NPC requires a copy of the signed volunteer
Docket No. NR2484-14

acknowledgment form before generation of Involuntary Title 10, U.S.
Code, section 12302 Mobilization Orders.” Nevertheless, no evidence
was provided to indicate that a modification to your orders was
requested. Regardless, the authority to place in an involuntary
status a member who volunteers from a mobilization does not exist in
law. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of

probable material error or injustice.

 

BERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001536

    Original file (20120001536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he accrued 96 days of PDMRA between September 2007 and August 2009 and converted 44 days of regular leave to PDMRA days leaving him with 52 days of PDMRA. The evidence of record and independent evidence provided by the applicant shows his extension on active duty to use accrued leave and PDMRA was approved. The record is void of any documentary evidence indicating the applicant requested additional days and was denied PDMRA during the period of active duty in which it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005667

    Original file (20110005667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant completed her last active duty mobilization period while a member of the United States Army Reserve on 11 August 2008, and has remained on active duty in another status since that date. However, the Army policy requires PDMRA to be used during the active duty period in which it was earned and there are no provisions to carry over or be monetarily compensated for PDMRA outside of the legal authority provided by the 2010 NDAA which expired on 28 October 2010. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026558

    Original file (20100026558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026558 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), section 604 provided special authority to monetarily compensate Soldiers who were REFRAD and not able to use PDMRA during the period between PDMRA authorization by the Secretary of Defense on 19 January 2007, and publication of the Army’s PDMRA implementation guidance on 18 August 2007. The evidence of record and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024518

    Original file (20110024518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110024518 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance (PPG) contains guidance on the PDMRA program in paragraph 8-10i. Soldiers unable to utilize accrued PDMRA days during their current mobilization order may be voluntarily retained on active duty under the provisions of Title 10 USC section 12301(d), Contingency Operations-Active Duty for Operational Support orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008533

    Original file (20110008533.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record shows the applicant was denied all or a portion of earned PDMRA and/or an extension on active duty to use earned PDMRA prior to release from active duty (REFRAD) from the period of active duty in which it was earned. The 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), section 604 provided special authority to monetarily compensate Soldiers who were REFRAD and not able to use PDMRA during the period between PDMRA authorization by the Secretary of Defense on 19 January 2007, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009553

    Original file (20080009553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his mobilization orders, two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his CO-ADOS request, his AIP request, electronic mail correspondence, a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Military Leave and Earnings Statement (LES), and excerpts from the Department of the Army Personnel Planning Guidance as evidence in support of this application. This correspondence shows, in effect, that the applicant informed the military pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024125

    Original file (20100024125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024125 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026773

    Original file (20100026773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026773 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023755

    Original file (20100023755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023755 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015970

    Original file (20100015970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100015970 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.